My take on the RF 70-200 F4

Started Feb 16, 2021 | User reviews thread
Ricky 92rt Forum Member • Posts: 60
Re: My take on the RF 70-200 F4

drsnoopy wrote:

davel33 wrote:

"It actually costs more than I paid (new) for my EF 100-400 L mk2"

Where can you get the 100-400 L mk2 for less then $1600 ? Amazon price on the EF 100-400 mk 2 is $2400. You must be thinking of the RF 70-200 F2.8 @ $2600. Let me tell you if I paid $2600 for a lens I would be looking for new wife

In the UK, the RF 70-200 f4 L is GBP1700 (about USD 2400) including tax. I paid GBP1600 (about USD 2300) for my EF 100-400 L mk ii, about 2 years ago, including a cashback offer. Prices do differ between countries, and discounts on new model lenses are rare. I might consider the RF70-200/4 if the price drops by about 25%, but not at the current price.

I think the price point is an issue for an F4 70-200mm, if you've a body with IBIS then the EF 70-200mm F4 and adapter is far more cost effect. Actually I don't see much optical difference between the two, I think the Cameralabs guy came to the same conclusion.

At the price the EF lens is it looks like a bargain, or possibly a used F2.8 EF

It's interesting what Canon did with the RF lenses, the lack of TC is a shame though not a show stopper. The cost is really quite high, on both the F4 and F2.8 is almost unrealistic really. I can see a lot of people adapting EF lenses even third party stuff too (the Tamron is also a good lens)

For me anyway MILC lenses are a little bit too expensive, OK let's not hold back they are both well overpriced. Go back 10 years and you'd get the F2.8 for the price of the F4 now.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow