DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

70-200 f/4L IS + x2 extender vs 100-400/4.5-5.6L

Started Mar 11, 2021 | Discussions thread
pawn Veteran Member • Posts: 3,261
Re: 70-200 f/4L IS + x2 extender vs 100-400/4.5-5.6L

DikkeryDok wrote:

As I've noticed, a lot of offers on the site you mentioned located in the USA, so I assume it's primarily targeted at the American audience. Which is a problem to say the least, for someone who doesn't live there. Not only currency exchange rate can make a good offer a bad one, but overseas shipping and import fees can turn said offer into outrageously expensive. But thanks for the answer anyway.

Like others said, bare lens (w/o adaptor) wins.  I second version II of the lens.  I have ut and it is great.  I used it with 7D Mark II for many years and am currently using it with R5.  It works great on R5 as well.

-- hide signature --
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow