16-shot pixel shift shooting -- Unusable gimmic?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Flat view
smiba New Member • Posts: 2
16-shot pixel shift shooting -- Unusable gimmic?

Hey Everyone,

Simple question, has anyone ever managed to get a good shot with 16-shot pixel shift?

I have tried to use it again today on a still macro shot, with my camera as perfectly still as I could on a tripod, but the 16-shot just always causes really ugly artifacting that makes the image look soft zoomed out, and just gross zoomed in.

The 4-shot pixel shift actually looks a bit better then the single shot, but 16-shot I just never managed to make it look right. It honestly is unusable.
As Sony heavily advertises this feature, I assumed it worked better then it does. Any pixel shift shots are also unusable for landscapes, because anything that moves between the shots will show up really ugly.

Judge for yourself:

Reference image (4-pixel shoot, which I think looks the best)

Single frame (100% zoom)

4-pixel shift shot (100% zoom)

16-pixel shift shoot (25% zoom)

16-pixel shift shot (100% zoom)

16-pixel shift shot (100% zoom, moved to the side of the pawn)


 smiba's gear list:smiba's gear list
Fujifilm X100V Sony a7R IV Sony FE 90mm F2.8 macro Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow