Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
thunder storm Senior Member • Posts: 6,423
Re: M200

allineedislight wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

allineedislight wrote:

in any case, to choose between M100 and M200 I would recommend watching the M200 cameralabs review:


he actually recommends in the end getting the M100 if you can still find one

That is a very bad advice if you want good AF.

if you are on a fixed budget, I think its better to get a M100 plus the 22mm prime

than M200 with just the kit lens.

just my 2cents.

That's about different kinds of better.  It's always better to get the 22mm prime in stead of the kitlens, regardless the body. But, keeping other factors - like lenses -  equal, the M200 is focusing way better than the M100. If you are planning to use primes like the 32mm and 56mm f/1.4 and/or to shoot in low light conditions, it makes sense to get the M200.

I'm not saying the M200 is better for everyone. If you're only purpose is doing landscapes, get the M100.

-- hide signature --

I love 50mm (equivalence)

 thunder storm's gear list:thunder storm's gear list
Canon EOS R Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III +17 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow