davev8
•
Veteran Member
•
Posts: 4,833
Re: RP and 100-400 EF (not version II) and 2X Canon converter
jboyer wrote:
I fitted this combination on the RP while questioning the idea of trading this for a RF 800mm.
I believe the 100-400 is a better lens. But for birds, 400 is somewhat short.
Suggestions and opinions?
Thanks.
i had a friend with the 100-400mki and i have researched and looked at a lot of photos from that lens and came conclusion that evan without a converter and with no cropping the IQ from that lens is border line for ..the RF 800 is MUCH sharper than the 100-400 + X2 but the 800 is a one trick pony
here you can see the tamron 150-600 G2 is better than the 100-400 + 1.4X mkiii and faster at F6.3 VS F9
the tamron 150-600 + 1.4x vs RF 800mm the 800 has the edge but the tamron is faster evan with the X1.4 at F9 vs F11
i would not entertain the 100-400 mki...the 800 has the best IQ but i think the versatility of the 150-600 makes it a much more usable lens unless you are only ever need 800mm
-- hide signature --
.
.
.
.
Attention Dislexsic i mean dyslexic person... This post will have many although spell checked, spelling and grammatical errs ..its The best its going get so no need to tell me it is bad I know it is .....................................................................................................
My 5D IS a MK1 classic
.........................................................................................................
There is no argument for FF vs APS-c (or m43) with shallow DOF..as it's a law of physics and a very subjective personal thing if you want to make use of the shallow DOF only FF can offer
.....................................................................................................
If you wait for a camera that will tick all your boxes ....by then you will have more boxes to tick..... so the wait continues .....David Appleton