14/23 vs 16/27

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
jjz2 Senior Member • Posts: 2,946
Re: 14/23 vs 16/27
3

Kyle Logan wrote:

I’ve been shooting predominantly with a 14/23 combo for a while now. I know these are classic Leica focal lengths. And I like them. The imminent release of the new 27 has me thinking now. The 14 is not weather sealed and can be difficult to compose with. The 23/2 feels a tad wider than traditional 35mm. Perhaps I just split the difference and go for the weather sealed combo? This would enable me to get rid of my 35 1.4 and simplify with an all arounder 27. Questions: for those that went 14 to 16, did you regret it? Similarly, for those that went 23 to 27, did you find it too tight? I could care less about the f stop. Mainly interested in weather sealing and compactness. Any comments would be appreciated.

Haha... hmm I have most of those and they all serve a purpose 14 23 27 35... not planning on getting rid of any of them.

I’d say the 27 is more of an alternate when I want just that lens and nothing else to go small.

 jjz2's gear list:jjz2's gear list
Fujifilm X-T1 Fujifilm X-E3 Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow