Improving on m43 as a compromise solution

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
JurassicPizza
OP JurassicPizza Contributing Member • Posts: 813
Re: Improving on m43 as a compromise solution

Brett8883 wrote:

Jacques Cornell wrote:

24MP vs. 20MP doesn't get you much more in terms of IQ, especially if you prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio, as I do. And, the DR benefit of APS is marginal. That's why I'm keeping my MFT kit to complement my a7(x) kit rather than getting a6xxx.

I hear ya but I think the E-M5 II is 16MP no? Seems to me 16 to 25 seems like a considerable jump especially if it’s to a larger sensor where as 16 to 20 on the same size sensor doesn’t seem nearly as appealing.

Correct, the E-M5 II is 16MP.  24+MP would be an appreciable increase, 20-21 definitely not worth the change (which is why I'm not looking at the current generation m43 cameras).

-- hide signature --
 JurassicPizza's gear list:JurassicPizza's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Olympus Tough TG-4 Nikon D800E Nikon 1 V2 Olympus E-M5 II +20 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow