Is the William Optics RedCat 51 worth buying?

Started 4 months ago | Questions thread
JeffSlade Regular Member • Posts: 496
Re: Is the William Optics RedCat 51 worth buying?

Saabster wrote:

starman1969 wrote:

I've been after a short focal length refractor for wide field deep space imaging and I have been looking at so many scopes. For a while I have been using standard camera telephoto lenses due to being without a scope for a while.

The RedCat would suit my style of astrophotography more than any other, but I'd like to know if it is worth buying over a similar focal length standard camera lens?

As an owner of the Whitecat 51 (Redcat was out of stock and Spacecat hadn't been released yet) I have to say yes, it's worth it over a camera lens.

My main camera is a Pentax K-1 and I mount the whitecat on either a Losmandy G-11 or Explore Scientific IEXOS-100.

I absolutely love the FF/Whitecat combo. I also have the following lenses (amongst others), 300mm f/4, 70-200 f/2.8, 150-450 f4.5-5.6. None have them have the flat field, pinpoint stars, and lack of CA that the WC has. Not to mention that I can use 2" Astronomical filters with it.

Here's a few samples of the combination:

M31 45x60sec


M42 60x120sec Optolong L-Enhance filter used.

Beautiful images! What Bortle area were those taken from if I may ask?

-- hide signature --

I believe in wabi-sabi : a world view centered on the acceptance of transience and imperfection. I appreciate beauty that is "imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete" in nature.

 JeffSlade's gear list:JeffSlade's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Fujifilm X-T1 GoPro Hero7 Black Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +7 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow