DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

If You Get A Good Copy It's AMAZING Locked

Started Dec 9, 2020 | User reviews thread
This thread is locked.
MikeJ9116 Veteran Member • Posts: 6,955
Re: If You Get A Good Copy It's AMAZING

RDM5546 wrote:

SonyX wrote:

RDM5546 wrote:

You do not have count on reviewers. Just compare the RF lens with a 24mm Canon prime lens like I did.

I have taken a picture of a brick wall with EF 24mmf1.4L II lens and the RF 24-240mm at the same time using the lenses on a tripod mounted EOS R and compared the the raw images the RF 24-240 at the 24 mm marking covers a field 8% bigger than the EF 24mm lens. Roughly 22.5mm FL. When you look at the SOOC JPEG Image of the RF lens when doing this it nearly identical to the image the EF lens makes, i.e. 24mm. Below are the SOOC Corrected JPEG image from EOS R and a screen shot the the RAW image of the same uncorrected RAW file (see the corners and the amount of edges cut off by the correction as well are the removal of the distortions):

thank you for you time to do the test.
Will be glad to see raw files of 24 vr 24-240 at infinity

I takes time to do a test. What do you expect? I doubt there is any difference in the angle with the focus point myself. What do you expect? You own need see the RAW image of the the 24-240mm at infinity without correction. I have seen this and the black corners are still there and they are gone in the corrected and cropped image. Using the 24 seem redundant. You seem unconvinced. Is the reason for that? I am not yet convinced that will change your mind and may time will be wasted.

This one baked my noodle. I took two photos with the camera on a tripod. One with the 24-240mm at 24mm and the second with the EF 24-105mmL at 24mm. All in camera corrections were turned off.  This is the SOOC JPGs I got:

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow