35-100 2.8 vs ?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
inlawbiker Senior Member • Posts: 1,958
35-100 2.8 vs ?

I decided to thin my camera gear down and came back to using the 12-35 2.8 and 35-100 2.8 for landscape and travel photos. I do touring by motorcycle so space is at a premium.

I always loved these two lenses but sold the 35-100 2.8 and regret it now. Compared to the 12-35, which I love, I thought the 35-100 was a notch better.

So before I buy it back again, I'd like to consider the 50-200 or 100-400. I know they are bigger but not much more expensive and really expand my reach. I can add wildlife photos here as well, but in my experience 400mm FF equiv is not quite enough, so I would lean towards the 100-400.

Anybody done this swap for the old but esteemed 35-100 2.8 ?

 inlawbiker's gear list:inlawbiker's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Sony a7C Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 Tamron 35mm F2.8 Di III OSD
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow