Canon R5 Hand-Held

Started 3 months ago | Questions thread
Davidof_CR Regular Member • Posts: 144
Re: Canon R5 Hand-Held: the pixels are much smaller.
1

Difficult to answer.

I have both, but there were no time to compare them both in the same situation.

If you value lightness of your gear and if you never use tripod, then EM1-3 has a lot to offer, especially with 12-100. Such lens is difficult to beat - with 24-100 you have half the reach. 24-240 is no match to 12-100, I think.

It also depends, what other lenses you plan, and how much you value thin depth of field.

With EM1-3 + 12-100 + 25/1.2 you can travel the world and bring beautiful pictures.

With R6 + 24-105 + 50/1.8 too

But you might miss the 106-200 reach, HHHR, 1-2 sec exposures, Live ND, Live Composite, PreCapture, 60 RAWs/sec ...

It all depends on you

David

 Davidof_CR's gear list:Davidof_CR's gear list
Ricoh GR II Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 Canon EOS R6 Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM +5 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow