Question on R5 Image Processing
noms78
•
Regular Member
•
Posts: 185
Re: Question on R5 Image Processing
Chris_Chapterten wrote:
R2D2 wrote:
Noogy wrote:
I have raw files from my EOS R with file size range of 40-45mb a piece, while my 32mp M6II would range from 35-40mb a piece. In my 12-core 9th Gen i7 desktop machine that runs on nVidia GT1050ti GPU and SSD, to batch process/convert to JPEG 5 raw files would take me approx:
- EOS R - 109 seconds
- M6II - 134 seconds
- 6D - 56 seconds
- All processed on SSD then later on moved to HDD
While my PC specs are just slightly above average, I was wondering if I would need to also start upgrading my machine in the event I purchase the R5. For obvious reasons, I did not have to upgrade more than a year ago when I moved from the 5DMIV to the EOS R.
What's the file size range of an R5 raw file and how long does it take to convert it into either TIFF or JPEG?
All figures here btw are using Canon's proprietary DPP (digital lens optimization on), landscape profile, all other settings at default). I also don't have any storage issue because I have more than adequate cloud subscription and 8TB of HDD that's only 40% full on a machine with an OS that runs on 512gb SSD.
I did have to build a new PC when I bought the 32 MP M6ii last year. DPP is definitely pokey, but my beef isn’t about the converting times (I just take a break and check my email). It’s the rendering delay as I make my initial adjustments. I’d love to see a more efficient software build!
R2
I completely agree. It’s difficult to make adjustments when there is so much delay in the rendering. I like to move the slider back and forth quickly to be able to eye ball the results. It’s a shame that the colours in Adobe software are so poor...
/rant on
I don't like the processing of the vast majority of the R5 / R6 / 5D4 photos I see on the web. Im still trying to find R5 samples on Flickr that would entice me to upgrade. Seems like most people who currently buy R5 are bird photographers.
I also hate the heavily edited images that are becoming commonplace in landscape photography. Hate instagram - the quality of photos is rubbish (low res/compressed) compared to Flickr. There is too much crap on Flickr and skyscrapercity now. Its getting harder and harder to find "inspiration" for the type of photography I am into.
/ rant off
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM
Canon EF 24-70mm F4L IS USM
Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
|
|
|
|
Jan 16, 2021
|
Jan 5, 2021
|
Dec 28, 2020
|
Dec 21, 2020
|
The Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro O.I.S. is a moderately sized, moderately far-reaching and optically-stabilized telephoto zoom lens for full-frame or APS-C L-mount cameras. Read our review to find out how it performs.
When Olympus released the E-M1X sports camera in late 2019, the company also released a modern editing app called Olympus Workspace. Is it fully featured and fast enough to replace an Adobe-based editing workflow? Let's find out.
Being cooped up inside doesn't mean you have to take a break from photography. If you've got negatives from way back when, what's the best software around to scan them? Check out our in-depth comparison to find out.
The Sony Alpha 1 is Sony's flagship mirrorless camera for, well, just about anything. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. Add in 8K video capture and you have a really impressive package.
The Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is a compact general-purpose lens for Sony's APS-C, E-mount mirrorless cameras. So how does it perform? Read our review to find out.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. Click through to see our picks.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2500? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best.