Does the new RF 50mm make the (heavy and expensive) RF 35mm redundant?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
Dan W Regular Member • Posts: 360
Re: Does the new RF 50mm make the (heavy and expensive) RF 35mm redundant?

DaveyA wrote:

I do appreciate the helpful comments about the restrictions of the longer focal length, and I’m glad my question gave someone a good laugh.

I'm sorry if I sounded like I was making fun of you, that wasn't my intent. I'm used to using L lenses and most of those come in pounds, not ounces like both the new 50 and the 35 1.8

So yes they both are very light compared to any other lens out there worth owning. Im not sure what your using but I assume the RP or maybe the R? I came from the 5D3 and that was a heavy camera even without a lens mounted compared to my R. Obviously your new looking for knowledge, don't let comments like mine deter you from enjoying the hobby.

Happy shooting...

 Dan W's gear list:Dan W's gear list
Canon EOS R Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow