Canon RF 24-105/F4 versus RF 24-240/F4-6.3?

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
ProDude Senior Member • Posts: 2,120
Re: Canon RF 24-105/F4 versus RF 24-240/F4-6.3?

Swerky wrote:

But also when hiking, an L lens will be more resistant to dust and the different natural elements. A non L lens will require more care. Specially a superzoom like the 24-240.

Here's where it get's dicey. If you are going to subject the 24-240 to moisture and salt by a ocean, banging around hiking, extreme heat like Arizona in the summer and such, then I'd have to say that is where the L's come into their own with resistance to those conditions and better longevity. But if you are cautious the 24-240 should survive as long as you are on this planet.

-- hide signature --

Name the gear and I've probably owned it and used it.

 ProDude's gear list:ProDude's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG HSM Art Sigma 105mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM +17 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow