Re: Sometimes not tech/cost issue
Bolothegreat wrote:
forest dream wrote:
An X-t30 in rangefinder livery with an X100V shutter/ISO dial is an interesting but not compelling market proposition, the market has moved on.
Agree that other camera maker already moved on. But, I found that Fujiflm still stick to (less innovation) market segmentation for pricey premium camera.
Examples: dual card slot & WR is simple tech and low cost, but never apply to mid-range Fujiflm camera.
IMO dual card slot more important than HDMI slot in camera. If space issue, replace HDMI with dual card slot.
For WR (not IP rating and without any guarantee) in camera body (which has few dials), it just few simple rubber sealing. I still remember OnePlus 6 (phone) provide water-resistant in low price (because not IP67).
Mate you seem to be repeating the same few things about Fuji in every thread. Do you have anything nice to say about Fuji at all?
I'm sure Fuji will have something special to make the X-E4 worth buying just like they did with their previous cameras including the X-S10. There's plenty of innovations from Fuji & they seem to look after their customers. In fact many people have been switching from other manufacturers to come to Fuji. When it comes to apsc there is no better choice.
IMO Fujiflm X-T3 & X-T30 is good camera, far better than others brand. X-E3 is a best affordable choice in grey market too.
If X-E4 has same specs with X-T30 (but far more expensive), better stay with grey market X-T30.
Old brilliant camera e.g. X-T3/X-T30 not means all other model also brilliant.
Are Fujiflm X-T200 popular in market? Although it is a capable camera, consumer always demand more.
Are Canon EOS M50 is a good as affordable stills camera? For me yes, but not agree on Canon EOS M50 Mark II (which has higher price but only upgrade firmware).