Which RF 70-200mm or should I stay with the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
Karl_Guttag Regular Member • Posts: 391
If we are spending YOUR money . . .

Steve W wrote:

So I am wondering if its worth spending 2x or 3.5x more money for either of the RF lenses. In the past I would rush out and spend the money for the latest and greatest but I guess I am getting more conservative in my old age especially since I am not getting to travel as much right now to take advantage of my kit. Also I know the RF 70-200 f/4L won't take the 1.4X teleconverter which I might have considered if I went down that path

So what do you think? Any opinions

https://j.mp/2IV7Kn7

If we are spending YOUR money, then I say get the very best.

Realistically, it is only a decision you can make. It depends on how much you will use the lens and what you can afford to pay. At the same time, make sure you are happy with any compromises you make.

Personally, I was debating between the RF 15-35 f2.8 and waiting on a rumored RF 14-35 F4L. I just ordered the f2.8L (back-ordered).

 Karl_Guttag's gear list:Karl_Guttag's gear list
Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS RP Olympus E-M5 III Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM +15 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow