Is 17-35mm f2.8 Nikon still good?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Michael Benveniste
Michael Benveniste Veteran Member • Posts: 5,495
Re: 17-35mm f2.8 bokeh is harsh
1

dave gaines wrote:

I've only tested this recently and not many times. Your results may vary. I'd ask people here who like their 17-35 lenses to give this a try when focusing close with a background element in the frame. Let us know what you think.

Quick snap of my living room with an OOC JPEG:

Yes, I know the EXIF is munged.  I've never figured out why.

And a 100% crop of the gumball machine and the bookcase:

If you take a look at the clock and the Law Dictionary, you can see why I consider the bokeh to be "meh."  There's some bright line and doubling evident, but I can't really call it harsh.

-- hide signature --

Light travels at 2.13085531 × 10^14 smoots per fortnight. Catch some today!

 Michael Benveniste's gear list:Michael Benveniste's gear list
Nikon Coolpix 995 Nikon D800 Nikon 1 V2 Nikon D7200 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 +43 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow