Is 17-35mm f2.8 Nikon still good?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Timotis77
Timotis77 Contributing Member • Posts: 579
Re: Is 17-35mm f2.8 Nikon still good?
1

jassyou wrote:

I am thinking to buy f2.8 lens for landscape photography and this lens is one of the options. the price also is affordable. I do not want to buy 12-24 because I cannot use filter. Is this lens still good or is there any options?

You could also look at the 16-35 f4 - As if you plan to use the lens primary for landscape, rarely would you be shooting wide open at 2.8 - In fact most likely stopped down to f56-f11 and anywhere in between!

If you want a 17-35mm maybe also look at the Tamron 17-35mm 2.8-4, its newer and a really good option, it has VC (VR) - though again in landscape you maybe shooting off a tripod and VC/VR isnt really a needed

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow