Trade my Canon 6dii for Canon M6ii?

Thanks to RLight and Nnowalk for this discussion.  My recent responses in this thread have been solely in regard to trading the 6D2 with an L zoom for an RP with STM zoom.  Especially since the OP already has the former and would have to sell and re-buy to make that lateral trade.  I only joined this discussion because I have thought about this myself and it only made sense going for the RF L zoom - i.e. starting down the road to converting to an R kit.  I also figured I'd have to buy the 35 and 80 RF macro primes and so the $$ for this one move began to add up.  To me, the RP only makes sense within the context of a full R system.  Just like the M only makes sense in the context of an EF system.  Neither are complete by themselves.

Yes, this is all personal trade-offs.  When I purchased my original 5D and 24-105 IS L in 2006 it was a revolution in my photography.  The images were stunning, as they still are still with my 5D4 or 6D2 and that same 24-105 lens.  Add in the 100-400 L and I'm photographically blessed.  I've always concluded that the f2.8 L zooms and the big whites were above my pay grade, same as the 1 series bodies.  The high end RF lenses are phenomenal, but not worth the upgrade costs to me.  I'd have to replace over a dozen nice EF lenses that I've collected over 17 years.  Several of these don't exist outside EF.

My original post in this thread suggested BonnieSueM, the OP, consider adding a G1X3 as a light alternative.  I still think this the best option.  Its lens and 24 MP APS-C sensor are phenomenal for a 14 oz camera.  Its better than my EF-S 15-85 which has always been my best APS-C general purpose zoom.  This is the first G series I'd make this claim about.  The M and Rebel kit zooms can't compare.  However there are some great EF-S and M lenses.  The R system has good lenses  but they are incompatible with EF cameras like the 6D2 or M.  Buying an RP starts down the road of switching to a full R system - a big choice.  This may be just me.  I don't like adapters and one of the biggest hassles with my M6II is that I have to use an adapter for my preferred lenses (except the 11-22 and Sigma 56).  Adapters also add at least 1/4 lb to the weight calculations.

I get light weight, I love hiking and backpacking.  The G1X3 + M6II + 35 macro + 55-250 weighs less than 3 1/2 lbs.  I also appreciate full frame and the f4 L zooms.  I find both indispensable.  The G is there when I have the 100-400 on my DSLR or I'm just out in the city.

Again, thanks for the discussion.  Its helped me confirm my thoughts on this subject just as I'm sure its helped you confirm yours.  Good luck to BonnieSue in your decision process.

Be sure to look at the original when comparing.

An in-camera panorama