Canon R6 Vs Nikon Z6 II - Taylor Jackson

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
NexLupus Contributing Member • Posts: 829
Re: Canon R6 Vs Nikon Z6 II - Taylor Jackson

rokoko wrote:

Tim Kamppinen wrote:

I’m not an old-lens aficionado and I’m a skeptic when it comes to “microcontrast” and similar “magical” lens properties. Nevertheless, I posted this image from the 70-200 2.8 S lens in the Nikon Z facebook group and multiple people were apparently astonished by the swirly bokeh, with a mix of positive and negative reactions. I don’t know if it it qualifies as “magic” (or if it’s all that different from my old VRII) but I like the look.

Most importantly if your clients feel happy, so will you. Do they know/care swirly bokeh or cats eye? I guess not.

What amazes me is how a post about an overall positive review was hijacked by folks arguing about Taylor Jackson's assessment, after using both systems side by side, that the Nikon's are less clinical than Canon's.

To the OP, thank you for sharing the review, really enjoyed it.

 NexLupus's gear list:NexLupus's gear list
Nikon Z7 Nikon Z6 Nikon Z 24-70mm F4 Nikon Z 50mm F1.8 Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow