GF 30 vs 32-64

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Manzur Fahim
Manzur Fahim Veteran Member • Posts: 3,451
Re: GF 30 vs 32-64
1

fkaphotoblogger wrote:

Hi all:

From what I've read here, and the excellent testing on Jim Kasson's blog, the consensus is that the performance of the 30/3.5 is close enough to the 32-64 at 32mm that the recommendation would be to get the 32-64. Right now my only native lens is the 45/2.8 and I've also been using adapted vintage lenses.

I know some people have suggested the 30 and 45-100/4 as a good pairing that might be more versatile then the 32-64.

I mainly shoot street and hiking photos with the GFX. I've still been using my Sony for portraits. Any recommendations?

For shooting street and hiking, 32-64mm is greay and useful due to the focal length. It is a great walkaround lens, and image quality is on par with primes. I'd choose the 32-64mm.

Thanks,

MED

 Manzur Fahim's gear list:Manzur Fahim's gear list
Fujifilm GFX 100 Sony a7R IV Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 Fujifilm GF 110mm F2 Fujifilm GF 23mm F4 +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow