GF 30 vs 32-64

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
spilla Regular Member • Posts: 483
Re: GF 30 vs 32-64

fkaphotoblogger wrote:

Hi all:

From what I've read here, and the excellent testing on Jim Kasson's blog, the consensus is that the performance of the 30/3.5 is close enough to the 32-64 at 32mm that the recommendation would be to get the 32-64. Right now my only native lens is the 45/2.8 and I've also been using adapted vintage lenses.

I know some people have suggested the 30 and 45-100/4 as a good pairing that might be more versatile then the 32-64.

I mainly shoot street and hiking photos with the GFX. I've still been using my Sony for portraits. Any recommendations?

Thanks,

MED

I have the 30 and 45 — the 30 is a solid lens, very light and portable. Think main reason to choose it over 32-64 is size. It complements the 45 very well.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow