Replacing FE 28 and FE 55 to FE 35/1.8, or not?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
ahaslett Veteran Member • Posts: 7,814
Re: Replacing FE 28 and FE 55 to FE 35/1.8, or not?

voronspb wrote:

ahaslett wrote:

Unless you shoot the primes wide open a lot, what about the 28-75/2.8?

No, that's definitely not a suitable lens for me. For regular shooting I'll prefer prime lens over standard zoom seven days a week. UWA or telephoto is entirely different story. Besides, I need a compact and lightweight standard lens for the occasions when camera dimensions matter.

If you only pick one, then 35 or 40mm makes sense.  There are a lot of options in FE mount.  Smallest is Samyang 35/2.8, best all-round option is Sony 35/1.8.  The 35 & 40mm Noktons have the widest shooting envelope for the weight, if you are happy with MF.

I'd pick the 35/1.8, but I already have the 28-75/2.8 and the Tamron 35/1.4.  The Tamron 35/2.8 beats the Sony 35/2.8 on everything, apart from size.


-- hide signature --

Infinite are the arguments of mages. Truth is a jewel with many facets. Ursula K LeGuin
Please feel free to edit any images that I post

 ahaslett's gear list:ahaslett's gear list
Sigma DP1 Merrill Sigma DP3 Merrill Olympus E-M1 Sony a7R Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 +27 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow