X-T1 to X-T4 Upgrade - Best General Purpose Lens

Jerry-astro wrote:

KariP wrote:

With X-T4 IBIS you do not really need OIS lenses.

In some tests ( like "Optical Limits" that i value ) 16-55f2.8 is optically not exceptional or stellar - or much better than 18-55.

it 16-55 is heavier and is a WR lens - but look at the price and weight first. It is an expensive big lens - is it really worth it?

Status value is of course a factor.

Kari, it's rare that we disagree, but on this one, we certainly do. I've owned both the 18-55 and 16-55. Optically, IMHO, there's simply no comparison... the 16-55 pretty well wins across its range, not to mention the fact that the constant f/2.8 aperture can be a big benefit for low light photography. I didn't acquire my 16-55 until I had purchased the X-H1, since I rely heavily on stabilization and do a fair amount of photography in challenging lighting. I found the optics across the FL range to be noticeably better on the 16-55, and while I respect Optical Limits (I haven't read the review in question), my own experience has been very different. If you value stabilization and own a camera with IBIS, I think the choice is pretty simply and the IQ difference significantly more dramatic that what you suggested in your post. I don't disagree with the weight as potential issue for some, but in my case at least (with the X-H1), I find that a heftier lens like the 16-55 actually balances and handles better than the lighter 18-55. Of course YMMV.

And, finally, this has absolutely nothing to do with status, at least for me. I see my gear as a set of tools, not something that defines status in any form. If anything, when I'm out photographing birds or other wildlife and run into other photographers, the reaction I get is almost universally one of curiosity... particularly from long time DSLR users who haven't yet made the move to mirrorless.

I mentioned also the price - 16-55 is about 1100€ and 18-55 comes often in a bundle ... half the price perhaps.

16-55 could work  quite well with my X-H1 and i read some tests ... i seriously considered the lens. But - perhaps some day if there is an offer.

In the beginning 18-55 had some sample/quality issues and there are good samples and some not so great. My lens (18-55)  came with X-E1 some (many);-) years ago and i have been quite happy with the IQ. I have compared it with 23f2, 55-200  and 55f1,2 also.

Perhaps you are not interested in status things - i think very many want "The Best" - even if they can not even use it   Even on this serious  specialist forum. Not meaning You 

If my 18-55 stops working i will replace it with 16-55 of course

and the 16mm vs 18mm angle of view difference is sometimes important.

But - as an upgrade from 18-55  i'm not sure if it really is worth it - compared to other possibilities. But why not if budget is OK