16/2.8 and 16/1.4 - Comparison image pair - Thoughts?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
OP Rod McD Veteran Member • Posts: 7,156
Re: 16/2.8 and 16/1.4 - Comparison image pair - Thoughts?


I bought the 16/1.4,  23/1.4 and 35/1.4 when they were the only options for those FLs.   Fuji hadn't even announced the f2s.....  I agree that faced with the choice today, the primary distinctions are the aperture v. size and weight.  Of the three, the only FL where the choice doesn't make a lot of difference is 35mm.  Objectively, the 35/1.4 is bigger and heavier, but not by anywhere near as much as the 16mm and 23mm.

I'll also post a comparison pair from the 23mm's when I get around to it.  My experience thus far is that they too are fairly similar at middle apertures -  I'd give an advantage by a whisker to the 23/1.4 when viewed at 200%, but at 100% it would be very hard to tell.

Cheers, Rod

 Rod McD's gear list:Rod McD's gear list
Canon PowerShot G1 X Olympus Tough TG-4 Fujifilm X-T1 Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO-Lanthar SL II Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R +14 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow