DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

RF 50mm f1.2 users (and probably EF version as well), do you use a protective filter on it?

Started Oct 13, 2020 | Questions thread
highdesertmesa
highdesertmesa Senior Member • Posts: 1,241
Re: Quit ...

jnd wrote:

highdesertmesa wrote:

jwilliams wrote:

highdesertmesa wrote:

I always say there are two kinds of photographers: photographers who don’t use protective filters and photographers who have been sh!t on by a bird.

Quit taking pictures of birds asses and your problem will be solved

Somehow I've managed 30+ years of photography without ever getting bird sh!t on my lens.

Lol. Well, insert whatever experience made you realize Murphy's Law is real.

Best thing about a nano-coated filter like the B+W clear is mist/rain/dust/birdsh!t can be cleaned off with a t-shirt. The filterless crowd gotta get their Zeiss buttwipes and microfiber cloths out and have a major production.

So your gonna ruin a $100 filter with your T shirt?

I think the only $100 protective filter I've had was the 95mm for the RF 28-70, and I've since sold both in perfect condition. Some bottled water and a soft t-shirt don't seem to have any ill effect on the B+W nano coating.

If it doesn't have effect on $100 filter why should it have effect on $2000+ L lens with the latest coatings available on the front element?

I think the sunscreen or other oil example above is rather extreme, but sure, buy filter if you walk on a hot beach on sweaty shirt full of sunscreen. I manage just fine without filters, using just lens hoods and caps, sometimes cleaning by water and paper tissues too, without negative effects. Yesterday I did first cleaning of my RF 28-70 with compressed air to get out the accumulated dust and it's doing fine. It has been in mountains and on beaches. I'm more concerned with the extending plastic barrel when zooming and I clean it more often to minimize any dust ingression.

Extreme to some, more common to others. Environment is key, and if your environment does not require a protective filter, then sure, why use one? In my particular environment (desert Southwest) it can be calm one minute and then get hit with 30-50mph wind-driven sandy dust the next, particularly in monsoon season where it adds mist and rain to the equation.

With a high quality filter like B+W, you're not going to see any ill effect on IQ unless shooting at certain angles into the sun. So then it comes down to it being an issue of money versus benefit-for-the-money – each of us has to factor that based on our environment and use cases.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
jnd
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow