DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

RF extender experiences with RF 100-500 1.4x vs 2.0? Locked

Started Oct 16, 2020 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
PicPocket Veteran Member • Posts: 5,897
Re: RF extender experiences with RF 100-500 1.4x vs 2.0?

For pretty much every generation of teleconverters, 1.4x is a lot more sharper than 2x. Mostly to and extent where 1.4x means not much visible impact and 2x means clearly visible impact

Having said that, I have no experience with RF adapters yet, so if the 2x is at par with 1.4x, go for it

-- hide signature --
 PicPocket's gear list:PicPocket's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +16 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow