DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II vs. f/4L IS

Started Sep 29, 2020 | Discussions thread
OP 61094125 Forum Member • Posts: 92
Re: EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II vs. f/4L IS

I definitely agree that 16-35 can´t be replacement of 100mm macro. I have covered these focal length with different lens and I´m not using macro that much... And I feel I need sometimes seomething wider then 24 mm what I have...

-- hide signature --

Zdenek

 61094125's gear list:61094125's gear list
Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM Irix 11mm F4 +1 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow