Comparing UWA lens of M4/3 with standard lens of FF

Started 1 month ago | Questions thread
Flat view
abhisheks77 Regular Member • Posts: 395
Comparing UWA lens of M4/3 with standard lens of FF


Its a novice question. I have been using Olympus E-M1 (first version) with 12-40mm f/2.8 since a few years along with 50-150mm and 45mm prime.
I have developed interest in landscape photography, though I am not going to print them. Recently I tried my friend's FF camera. It obviously cover more scene in picture which looks impressive.

I do have option to buy Z6+kit lens. But I want to understand, if I buy 7-14mm f/4 [14-28mm f/8] for my E-M1, will it not beat 24-70mm in covering scene in single frame? Some post says that it will cover but it will be different to our eyes. What does it mean?

Even if I add 14-30mm with Z6, E-M1 + 7-14mm f/4 will still give equivalent image. Am I understanding it correctly technically or missing something?

Apart from ISO/low-light benefit, what other benefit we see for FF?

[Probably users who used M4/3 and FF, should be able to help me here]


 abhisheks77's gear list:abhisheks77's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Olympus 12-40mm F2.8 Pro Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro
Nikon Z6 Olympus E-M1
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow