DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

RP or M6 mk II

Started Sep 27, 2020 | Discussions thread
nnowak Veteran Member • Posts: 9,071
Re: RP or M6 mk II

Alastair Norcross wrote:

(IS) is irrelevant to me, because I shoot portraits of living things, which move, even when they're trying not to. I'm usually at 1/125 or faster for portraits. IS is irrelevant for me in this use case. If I shot portraits of corpses, I would probably appreciate the IS, but I don't, so I don't.

The whole 1/focal length rule came from a time when everyone shot film, most lenses were not very sharp, and people were not printing big.  High density sensors like that in the M6 II push things even further.  Your 1/125 - 1/200 is what I would consider the bare minimum for the 56mm f/1.4 of crop.

I shoot sports, and often at shutter speeds above 1/4000. My shots with IS come out sharper than the shots with it off. AF and tracking also tend to work better when the image is stabilized.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
MAC
MAC
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
MAC
KEG
KEG
MAC
MAC
MAC
KEG
KEG
MAC
MAC
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow