Tamron 28-75 + 70-180 VS 28-200

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
JamminHyaku
JamminHyaku Regular Member • Posts: 390
Tamron 28-75 + 70-180 VS 28-200

Watched Dustin Abotts comparison and I am just curious other peoples thoughts.

Personally I think id rather have the constant aperture lenses for their low light capabilities, they are both sharper and have smoother bokeh, but the difference to the 28-200 isn't anything major really.

The main difference I think is that the two constant apertures run 1020$ CAD + 1650$ CAD = 2670$ against the 28-200s 1030$ CAD, as well as not having to switch lenses around. That is quite the difference. Does anyone still recommend the dual lens setup in this comparison? Or has Tamron made these two lenses effectively obsolete to anyone who doesn't require that constant F2.8 and slight edge in IQ?

Thanks!

 JamminHyaku's gear list:JamminHyaku's gear list
Sony a7R II Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS Sony FE 50mm F1.8 Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 FE +7 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow