35mm battle Nikon Z 35 vs fuji?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
beatboxa Veteran Member • Posts: 7,435
Re: Side-by-Side wide-open Comparison

vegetaleb wrote:

beatboxa wrote:

Sukuwea Enikkusu wrote:

I never liked the 23mm 1.4 Fuji, even though it is highly praised. I used the 56mm 1.2 95% of time.

But on fullframe 35mm lenses really shine, much better bokeh and 3D Transition.

Yeah. The Fuji 23 1.4 vs 1.8 always reminded me of the Nikon 50 1.4 vs 1.8. The faster one is older and slightly worse (but obviously faster). This is just about the range where it starts to become hard to get clear subject separation in practice at most reasonable subject distances anyway. It's one of those cases of go very fast, or don't worry too much about it.

I'll just add that I personally am looking forward to the Z 40mm that is on the roadmap (which I suspect will be an F/2). It probably won't be as nice as the 35 S, but it will be small. And if it's small but pretty good, I'll probably replace (or maybe supplement) my 35.

Same here for the 28mm, hoping it will be f2 instead of 2.8. The 35mm is already light but the lighter the better if it keeps the Z IQ

My guess on the 28 is that it will be an F/2.8.  But we'll see.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow