Olympus 100-400mm F5-6.3 vs Olympus PRO 40-150mm F2.8 + teleconverter

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Funny Valentine
Funny Valentine Contributing Member • Posts: 675
Re: Olympus 100-400mm F5-6.3 vs Olympus PRO 40-150mm F2.8 + teleconverter
3

gary0319 wrote:

valerio18 wrote:

Thanks for the suggestions/comments!

Additional questions about the oly 75-300, I know that it can be a good alternative.. can it produce a good enough image? (at least on the level of oly 14-150 is sufficient for me)

I tried to find some reviews online but I can't find a lot about it😅

I have been considering adding the 75-300 for a lighter telephoto than my Pan Leica 100-400, particularly for my E-M5 III.

I have a friend that recently added Ike 75-300 an he also has the 14-150 (as do I). I asked the same question, “is it as good as the 14-150?”.... his answer, “exactly”. He also shoots with the 300 f/4 so he knows what good image quality is.

I personally find the quality of the olmypus 75-300 II at 300mm to be really good; here some example of shots at 300mm that I shot since I bought this lens.

full moon at 300mm.

frog at 300mm, acceptable detail and sharpness.

270mm at ISO 3200, feather detail is still acceptable in my option.

 Funny Valentine's gear list:Funny Valentine's gear list
Olympus E-M1 II Canon 6D Mark II Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 II +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
AVG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow