Curious if Nikon will respond to the new long, slow, cheap Canon teles

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
MOD Mako2011 Forum Pro • Posts: 26,753

ghostfox_1 wrote:

There's a huge gap in price between 2 and 3, and then again 3 and 4.

840 f/9 (ff) is doable for 1500$ ish (or cheaper, if you buy used). 150-600 and 1.4x tc.

700mm f8 is likewise (native 200-500 f mount with tc)

There's really no quality difference between 2 and 3, but there is between 3 and 4.

Basically, spend bit, or spend some, but if you want good quality you're going to spend money.

True...doesn't mean the new f11 might be perfect for a number of folks

Diffraction is going to kick in at some point too with the f/11 (and narrower) lenses.

Diffraction is present at all some cases it's not even detrimental at f22 and higher...depends on many variables

-- hide signature --

My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value (except to me and Lacie of course)

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
MOD Mako2011
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow