Is the Mitakon Mark III 50mm f/.95 any "shallower" than an F/1.2?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
S1shooter Forum Member • Posts: 52
Is the Mitakon Mark III 50mm f/.95 any "shallower" than an F/1.2?

So I love shallow depth of field, and low light photography and decided to try out the Mitakon Mark III 50mm. I gotta say I'm a little underwhelmed so far. I own a few vintage lenses, including the Konica Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 and am noticing no material difference in low light or shallow depth of field, and on top of that the Konica has much better Bokeh imo.

Am I missing something or should I send Mitakon their lens with my regards?

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow