Diffraction determined by entrance pupil or exit pupil?

Started 1 month ago | Questions thread
Jack Hogan Veteran Member • Posts: 7,435
Re: Diffraction, Fourier and Focal Planes

AiryDiscus wrote:

Jack Hogan wrote:

AiryDiscus wrote:

Jack Hogan wrote:

Enough wasteful diversions, back to substance. Where the rubber meets the road with regards to this sub-thread is the skill-testing question that was answered incorrectly below:

In the meantime I have a skill-testing question for you or anyone interested:

Let's say you have such an exit pupil and related function, a lens of focal length f and f-number N, focused at infinity. You use Fourier Optics to propagate the field at the exit pupil to the focal plane. How far precisely is that from the exit pupil? From the principal plane?

In the case that you wish to invoke the Fourier transforming property of a lens and use what I would call a focusing propagation, simply taking an FT, then the distance is one focal length.

Goodman would beg to differ. Vectors are once again being placed wantonly and without thought, just like some of the others I lamented about earlier , QED. Where is focal length measured from?

Here's some quotes from Goodman, on the section "Fourier transforming properties of lenses:"

Case of field 'at' the lens:

To find the distribution Uf(u, v ) in the back focal plane of the lens, the Fresnel diffraction formula, Eq. (4-17), is applied. Thus, putting z = f ,[...]

Case of field 'in front of' the lens:

Thus the amplitude and phase of the light at coordinates (u,v)are again related to the amplitude and phase of the input spectrum at frequencies (u/lambdaf ,v/lambdaf). Note that a quadratic phase factor again precedes the transform integral, but that it vanishes for the very special case d = f . Evidently when the input is placed in the front focal plane of the lens, the phase curvature disappears, leaving an exact Fourier transform relation!

I asked a pretty basic question: where is focal length measured from?  Anybody?

There is, again, no work to show (this is the fourier transforming property of a lens), unless you would like me to recreate proofs that have been known for what is now a very long time.

I encourage you to read the whole book, and not skim it around formulas you want to lift without context. Or take a course in the topic.

Prompt: using the variables at hand and any others that may be needed,

zi = f + ...

No definition of variables, vague open ended prompt. No thanks.

You really do not understand what I am asking, do you? What's the difference between  z1 and zi?


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow