Between 300mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and 80-400mm which one would you choose and why?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
briantilley
briantilley Veteran Member • Posts: 5,037
Re: Between 300mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and 80-400mm which one would you choose and why?

Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:

Igor Sotelo wrote:

Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:

I am thinking of:

  • 300mm f4 PF.
  • 70-200mm f2.8 FL.
  • 80-400mm f4.5-5.6 AFS.

The 300mm attracts due to size.

The 80-400mm because of the range.

The 70-200mm because it is fast.

300mm 4.0 PF is a speciality lens, meant to add 300mm to the lenses kit without too much size or weight.

I would go with a 70-200mm 2.8 FL. It’s currently the best DSLR 70-200 and very practical lens for portraits.

Thank you for the suggestion. I am also beginning to think 70-200 is the best compromise. But since I use the Z6 mostly these days, using a TC on top of FTZ seems a bit too much.

I've tried it, and it is a bit cumbersome - but it does work.

I think I should just wait for the Z mount lens.

Just be aware that there are no Z-mount TC's yet - nor do any appear on Nikon's Z roadmap.

Nikon also has a 100-400mm Z lens in the pipeline - I would assume this lens will not have the short-comings of the 80-400mm.

80-400mm 4.5-5.6 II is a good option too. Very versatile focal range, but it doesn’t focus close and isn’t built to pro standards.

If you go occasionally to 400mm, the 70-200 on a 2X will do fine and focus to 1.1m / 400mm, doubling as a macro lens. If you plan to go over 200mm very often, the 80-400mm is the more practical option.

 briantilley's gear list:briantilley's gear list
Nikon Df Nikon Z7 Nikon Z6 Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm F2.8G ED Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D +20 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow