Between 300mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and 80-400mm which one would you choose and why?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Parry Johnson
Parry Johnson Senior Member • Posts: 1,812
Re: Between 300mm f4, 70-200mm f2.8 and 80-400mm which one would you choose and why?

Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:

I am thinking of:

  • 300mm f4 PF.
  • 70-200mm f2.8 FL.
  • 80-400mm f4.5-5.6 AFS.

The 300mm attracts due to size.

The 80-400mm because of the range.

The 70-200mm because it is fast.

The 70-200 VR2 is probably my most-used lens aside from the 24-70G.  FX quality is top-notch at all focal lengths.  On a DX body, it gives you all the advantages of 300mm with excellent sharpness and AF speed, plus the extra convenience of the shorter range.  I'm also not afraid to use the 1.3X (2X FX equivalent) crop mode, or adapted to a Nikon 1 camera for 2.7X crop.  In other words, if you're okay with some adaptibility, it performs in many different situations.

Yes, the 300 PF should be sharper, but it's just as expensive and won't work with all bodies.  (Neither will the 70-200 E, and the VR2 version doesn't have an aperture ring -- something I miss with my previous 80-200.)


I'm not a big wildlife or sports photographer, so if that's your primary goal I'll echo the nod to the 200-500 or a Sigma/Tamron in that range.   My really old Tamron Adaptall 200-500 f5.6 still works well for the odd situation when I need plenty of reach, and again with crop cameras.

 Parry Johnson's gear list:Parry Johnson's gear list
Nikon D800 Nikon 1 V1 Nikon D7100 Nikon 1 V3 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8G ED-IF +21 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow