16-55 vs 3 primes

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
Loganberry Forum Member • Posts: 61
Re: 16-55 vs 3 primes
3

SrMi wrote:

Noticed that nobody recommends 16-80/4. I do not own one, but wouldn't it be a good alternative if zoom is preferred? 16-55 is really heavy and large.

I bought the 16-55 because it offered crackingly sharp images corner to corner. OK it is heavy but I was happy to live with that. By comparison the 16-80/f4 may be light but it produces images that are soft in the corners at 16mm and 80mm. Because of that I wouldn’t touch it with a bargepole. There are multiple reviews of this lens and all show it to be not one of Fujis best lens.

The 16-80/f4 is an alternative but not a particularly good one. To my mind the 18-55 f2.8-4 kit lens would be better. My copy of it was brilliant. And it is relatively light.

 Loganberry's gear list:Loganberry's gear list
Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro Olympus E-M5 III Fujifilm X-T4 Olympus Zuiko Digital 1.4x Teleconverter EC-14 Fujifilm 16-55mm F2.8R LM WR +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow