DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

16-55 f/2.8 /16 2.8 I.Q test shots

Started Jun 2, 2020 | Discussions thread
Rod McD Veteran Member • Posts: 8,589
Re: 16-55 f/2.8 /16 2.8 I.Q test shots
1

Hi,

It depends entirely on what sort of images you're interested in.  I shot these two test shots at f5.6 because the lab test site reports and many reviews indicate that both lenses are optimal at around f4-5.6.  I wanted to compare them at their optimum and at apertures I would actually use.  That's more important to me than f1.4, though it's nice to have it if needed.

I'm into landscape and nature mostly and architecture in my travels.  Neither are typically shot wide open, so I rarely shoot the 16/1.4 at f1.4.  I think it's just a whisker crisper than the 16/2.8 in these two images.   Have a careful look at 100% .  Eg check out the lattice work on the upper verandah of the rear building.  It may be that the focus was in a very slightly different place, so affecting the DOF, but I think in these two images, the 16/1.4 has a very slight edge.  I don't know how big you'd have to print to see it in a print.  It probably doesn't matter, but if you want the best from the format, and are prepared to be exacting to get it, it may be the better lens.  I need to get out with both and shoot some more side-by-sides to confirm.

Regards, Rod

 Rod McD's gear list:Rod McD's gear list
Fujifilm X-T4 Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO-Lanthar SL II Fujifilm XF 35mm F1.4 R Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow