Sony 20mm F1.8 first experiences (compared to 16-35 GM)

Started 10 months ago | User reviews thread
TheOwl360 Regular Member • Posts: 380
Re: Sony 20mm F1.8 first experiences (compared to 16-35 GM)

arneh wrote:

TheOwl360 wrote:

While I appreciate your efforts, the review is highly flawed.

I agree the first comparison was flawed, and I apologize for that. If I could I would delete that part as it does not show the true performance of the 16-35 GM. But it's impossible to edit or delete a post here after someone has replied.
So please disregard the 16-35 images from the first post, and only look at what the 20mm does on its own.

I suppose that is what any person striving for intellectual honesty will have to do. Thing is, many don’t strive for intellectual honesty and, for some, confirmation bias will lead them to conclude the 20mm G is better than the  16-35 GM in terms of IQ. That is a pity but it’s the norm, unfortunately.

 TheOwl360's gear list:TheOwl360's gear list
Sony RX100 VII Sony a7R III Sony a6400 Sony a9 II Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* E 24mm F1.8 ZA +16 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow