Sony 20mm F1.8 first experiences (compared to 16-35 GM)

Started 10 months ago | User reviews thread
OP arneh Regular Member • Posts: 161
Re: Sony 20mm F1.8 first experiences (compared to 16-35 GM)

Bonsainz wrote:

Thanks for the mini review, and your opinion, will you keep them both?
Clearly to me the 20 just that little better overall,

The 20 is certainly a keeper I will keep the 16-35 for now, zoom is quiet convenient at times. But might sell it later if it turns out I'm not using it much anymore.

Also I see you have 28-75 Tamron how does it compare with the 24-105 you had .?

Yes, I had the 24-105 first, then bought the Tamron. They were very close in image quality. Tamron a little better in center, Sony a little better in corners. Closed down hardly any difference. F2.8 and smaller size and weight were more important to me than the focal range of the Sony, so I kept the Tamron. But both are great lenses!

 arneh's gear list:arneh's gear list
Sony RX100 IV Sony a7R III Samyang 8mm F2.8 UMC Fisheye Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 Sigma 70mm F2.8 DG Macro Art +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow