Panasonic vs Olympus : 15mm vs 17mm, 42.5mm vs 45mm

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
OP Och Elo Regular Member • Posts: 270
Re: Panasonic vs Olympus : 15mm vs 17mm, 42.5mm vs 45mm

Eric Nepean wrote:

Och Elo wrote:

Jumped back into M43 recently and realized how compact the whole system can be, so I want to round out a kit of primes.

I already have the 25mm 1.7 Panny.

I need a prime that's wider, and one that's portrait length, so it's one of the above lenses. I have an OMD EM10ii.

The 45/1.8 has a field that curves towards the camera at the edges, increasing the background blur. This is a plus if your composition has background at edges, e.g. a portrait, but may be undesireable in other compositions.

The 42.5/1.7 has a flatter field.

The 42.5 has OIS and the 45/1.8 does not. This may or may not matter dependng on the camera you are using.

Oh, didn't know that about the Oly lens. That's actually a plus for me as probably 95% of usage of such a lens would be portraits.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow