DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Good but not great

Started Apr 20, 2020 | User reviews thread
thunder storm Forum Pro • Posts: 10,139
Re: Good but not great

wjan wrote:

I think RF 24-105 4-7,1 is your boy.
90g lighter than 18-140 and better overall aperture 4-7,1 vs 5-8 equivalent full frame.
but only 105mm max reach.

Well, 105mm is a little too short for my taste. I feel I need at least around 150mm for my travel lens.
Also, this f/7.1@105mm of 24-105 is exactly equivalent to f/5.0@70mm of 18-140 (checked it right now).

What about the Tamron 35-150mm f/2.8-4.0 eventually + EF 24mm f/2.8 IS?

-- hide signature --

M for zooms, RF for primes

 thunder storm's gear list:thunder storm's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Sony a7 IV Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM +24 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow