DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

Started Feb 24, 2020 | Questions thread
OP Risto456 Junior Member • Posts: 41
Re: Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

Steve Balcombe wrote:

Kjeld Olesen wrote:

Steve Balcombe wrote:

This is a gear forum - of course you need it

Indeed - you may even be like me - acquire a lot of lenses that you never use. The main purpose is to have them, just in case ...
...

Still hesitant, but let's say if I was to get 135mm (or 105mm Art), which of the lenses mentioned would end up gathering dust in your view?

(out of 50, 85, 100 macro or 200mm prime;
as the 70-200mm 2.8L non-IS will going on eBay anyway)

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow