DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

Started Feb 24, 2020 | Questions thread
OP Risto456 Junior Member • Posts: 41
Re: Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

ikolbyi wrote:
...
Sigma 105 Art - all the stories you read/watch calling this lens referred to as the "bokeh master" are true. In some cases watered down from the truth. I even use this lens for sports.

Thanks.
I suppose since you are using 105mm nowadays, it was at least a bit better than the 135. I'm curious whether I should hold for some time and save up for the Art.

In your view, which were the selling points to switch from 135mm?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow