DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

Started Feb 24, 2020 | Questions thread
ikolbyi Senior Member • Posts: 1,290
Re: Do I really need an 135mm f/2L for portraits?

I use to own the following lenses:

* Canon 135mm f2L

* Canon 70-200mm f4L

Presently own the Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art

Conclusion:

Canon 135mm L is a fantastic oldie, you will not be disappointed in the images. Make sure you have plenty of working distance. Compact overall size and less weight.

Canon 70-200mm L is one of the few zoom lens that has prime image quality. Other advantages is Image Stabilization and can adjust your depth. If you purchase the f2.8 you will see nominal advantage from the 135mm f2 over 70-200mm f2.8 at 135mm focal. Cons: size and weight.

Sigma 105 Art - all the stories you read/watch calling this lens referred to as the "bokeh master" are true. In some cases watered down from the truth. I even use this lens for sports.

 ikolbyi's gear list:ikolbyi's gear list
Sony a6300 Olympus E-M5 III Olympus E-M1 III OM-1 Voigtlander 40mm F1.4 Nokton Classic +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow