EM-1 Miii: Fairly disappointed, but might still give it a try

Started 4 days ago | Discussions thread
drj3 Veteran Member • Posts: 9,609
Re: EM-1 Miii: Fairly disappointed, but might still give it a try
2

unhappymeal wrote:

Olympus is smoking the best of drugs. $2,400 CAD for a camera that is marginally better than its predecessor and its direct competition, the G9, is $1,200 - $1,500 CAD. You can buy into full frame for less than the E-M1 III. I'm genuinely worried about the future of Olympus.

All cameras for the last 10 years are marginally better than the previous ones.  In terms of IQ, there has been relatively little improvement.

If you consider the camera to be marginally better than other less expensive ones, then you certainly should not purchase the more expensive camera.  For some, your marginally better, is a very important difference.

If the FF gives you everything want you want for less, then you certainly should get the FF.  There will always be FF and APS cameras that cost less than the more expensive mFTs cameras.  There will be other things that the FF or APS will not do as well, but if those things are not important to you, then you should get the less expensive option that has a larger sensor.

You should worry about the future of ILC cameras.  As the market contracts, fewer manufacturers will be able to make a profit.  Olympus hasn't made a profit in years.  They have always said the camera division is critical for their other operations as the reason they have not closed it.

Panasonic dropped (sold) their semiconductor division this past November.  If the camera division doesn't make a profit, will they also drop (sale) it, since it is not critical for the company.

-- hide signature --

drj3

 drj3's gear list:drj3's gear list
Olympus E-510 Olympus E-5 Olympus E-M1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Olympus E-M1 II +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow