DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
Canadianguy Senior Member • Posts: 2,910
Re: Fujifilm has no one to blame but themselves.
3

The Davinator wrote:

In many ways, it is better than Bayer. Fuji has been clear that for high mp cameras like GFX, it is t necessary. That doesn’t mean XTrans is bad

Jerry and Bill just stated that Bayer vs X-Trans doesn’t matter in the whole scheme of things and you say they are spot on.

Then you go and tell us that X-Trans is better than Bayer in many ways – LOL.

To me – there is no absolute advantage on either side – for some scenes – Bayer will be “better” or if you use a different raw developer – X-trans maybe “better”. There are too many variables in play to say outright that X-Trans is “better” than Bayer in all situations.

But my point is that its Fujifilm marketing that is telling us it matters. Buy my X-camera because it has an X-Trans sensor (Fujifilm has gotten the general public to believe that X-Trans is a sensor tech and not just a CFA on top of the same Sony sensors as many other cameras).

Its Fujifilm's marketing messages that is driving us to have these discussions over and over again.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow