DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Latest Fuji X-trans vs Bayer, has X-trans lost it already?

Started Jan 23, 2020 | Discussions thread
georgehudetz Veteran Member • Posts: 6,299
X-H2, X-A5, and X-T3; ISO 200
4

All processed in CaptureOne from raw, all with C1's "Film Standard" profile, all with 100% vignetting removal applied, no lens correction, all with the same sharpening settings (my own preference: Amount = 467, Radius = 0.5, Threshold = 0.0).

These are all 100% views - no proofing applied, so all at the native resolution of the sensor (you can see that the X-T3 image looks like it is zoomed in a little more due to it's slightly higher native rez).

Upper left = X-H2, Upper Right = X-A5, Lower Left = X-T3.

Yes, this is just a screen dump from my MBP on a BenQ (non-retina/4k) monitor. I can post JPEGs if folks are interested.

But it looks to me that the X-A5 has a little more detail. Now, I realize that I should have downloaded an ISO 160 image for the X-Pro3. Maybe I'll try that later. But if this proves consistent, I may buy a X-T200 to keep with me for use with Landscape - particularly tripod shots. Hand-held I'll still take the IBIS in the X-H1.  And of course overall handling.

 georgehudetz's gear list:georgehudetz's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 Panasonic S 24-105mm F4 Macro OIS Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Panasonic Lumix S Pro 16-35mm F4 +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow